Marriage Is Not a Right — It’s a Privilege
Marriage Is Not a Right — It’s a Privilege
I’ve come to believe that marriage should not be a right granted to all.
Marriage, in its truest form, is not a civil convenience — it is a sacred covenant, a privilege that must be earned through maturity, reverence, and readiness. It is not something that should be entered into because one feels Twitterpated or lonely.
While many call marriage a civil right, I now believe it is instead the responsibility of the state and of the people to protect the sanctity of the institution — not for the sake of exclusion, but for the preservation of society and the spiritual fabric that binds it together.
This conviction transcends gender or orientation. It is about the meaning of commitment itself.
I believe marriage laws should be stricter and more discerning. Couples should be tested before being granted the right to marry — not tested in love, but in understanding: of sacrifice, of endurance, of covenant.
Divorce, I believe, should only be granted in cases of spiritual adultery — the true betrayal of one’s sacred vows. And no person should be permitted to remarry unless such a betrayal is proven. To do otherwise is to turn the holy into the hollow.
When we treat marriage as a disposable contract, we dishonor our ancestors, our society, our spiritual traditions, and each other. Why seek a marriage certificate at all if it is only a paper to be shredded the moment the work becomes inconvenient?
Until we as a people treat marriage — both civilly and spiritually — as the sacred institution it was meant to be, I cannot in good conscience endorse marriage as a universal right.
Marriage is not a right.
It is an honor.
And until we remember that, we are unworthy of it.
Comments
Post a Comment